Niftymitter 0.24 Parts list update

Have updated the niftymitter 0.24 parts list to 0.24.1 to accommodate a more detailed description of the trimcap (4 – 20 pf or sim.)

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Analysis | Leave a comment

Tester Report: Jonny

This in from Jonny:

Hi Roy,

sorry for delay, things have been pretty hectic. We managed to use the nifty meter at the gig! I took a short video.

Jonny’s Niftymitter testing report from Open Thing on Vimeo.

The band is a duo comprising of 2 guitars and 2 vocals. Too make the sound bigger we make up backing tracks and put them on an Ipod. This usual has electronic drums playing a bossa nova beat, bass guitar, cheesy organ and vintage synths.

We plug into a yamaha mixing desk which in turn plugs into 2 tapco thump active speakers and a powered monitor.

The sound generates in one corner of the room, so we thought it would be a good idea to transmit a signal from our mixing desk using the nifty meter to an FM radio that’s plugged into the bar’s extensive house system.

I used the RCA/phono to mini-jack cable to connect the mixers ‘record out’ to the nifty meter. At the other end I plugged the radio into the house system. We tuned the radio into the frequency transmitted by the nifty meter.

This meant when we played the sound of the band came through our PA and all round the venue through their house system. Amazing! The staff at the venue thought it was a great idea. There was no way we could have linked our desk to the house with a cable it was to far.

The nifty meter is a very useful product and proved so in this application.

I only had a crap radio, so the tuning was a bit delicate. Difficult to judge if it was the signal from the nifty, though I don’t think it would do any harm if there is a way of boosting it while still working from a 9v battery.

I think if it was to be used regularly in a gig situation it would benefit from a metal/wood or plastic case.

Also a stereo version would be good.

Keep up the good work. You’ve got a great product there!

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment

Tester report: Trevor

This is what I’ve got from Trevor so far:

I don’t want to send it back :-(

Having been set back by dodgy weather and poor service from Royal Mail I got off to a late start.

The main feedback I have is around the tuning. It was a bit of a pain as you correctly pointed out a ’special insulated device’ was required. First I tried tuning Niftymitter and then the radio – not the best option. Then I tried it the other way round – bingo! Still a little fiddly but I got there in the end. – RESULT. Maybe I should have read the instructions – typical male!

So after starting 2wks behind I decided to ‘enjoy’ the testing.

* Firstly I addressed an early morning radio bugbear. I like to listen to music while in the shower, but the majority of breakfast shows are a little bland for me. Enter the Niftymitter and my iPod. I now have the shower radio tuned in and delivering what I want to listen to.
* Next I always wanted my own radio show, podcasts just didn’t cut it for me – enter the Niftymitter. I surprised my 5yr old with radio show containing dedications to him and his mum. Which lead on to us both creating a radio show using his fav music (I’ve no idea why is fav track is Rocks by Primal Scream!?). That’s what I call a fun family activity.

The only outstanding thing I haven’t managed to try is some music making/creation. I did have big plans/ideas but time has obviously creeped up on me.

So let’s get down to some nitty gritty about the Niftymitter.

Ease of use overall 9.5/10, loses half a point for the tuning issue.
Would I buy one – yes
Would I recommend Niftymitter over other transmitters I’ve tried – yes

Some very generous ratings there from Trevor! I feel like niftymitter is on strictly come dancing or something..

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment

Niftymitter Issue updates

Have been updating the issue list this morning, with those in so far from testers Jonny, Trevor, Andrew and Nathaniel. Good stuff everyone, keep them coming..

Biggest issues are around the tuning, unsurprisingly really, which needs to be addressed in all cases. I think Andrew’s suggestion for an attenuator inline would be a great feature for a ‘home’ targeted model, suitable for how Trevor and he are using the transmitter. For Jonny’s needs (for band broadcast, with a PA system) however it seemed this was not an issue, but that the case design could be a lot more hardwearing.
Not highly complex, but nonetheless interesting stuff – please add comments if you have any below.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment

General update

Apologies for the recent lull in posts. I have slowly been receiving bis and bobs of testing results from the niftymitter 0.24 testers and do intend to document them all here soon.

Have been up in Dundee these past two days, getting promo shots for the exhibition in June. Would be great to have some authentic test units back from testers for that.

Again apologies for the silence, will try and rectify that in the coming days.

In the mean time, here’s a great wee video from Social Media Week that took place in Berlin recently, entitle Delivered in Beta, which, of course, is what we’re all about here..

Delivered in Beta from KS12 on Vimeo.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Tagged | Leave a comment

Volume level adjustment for Niftymitter 0.25?

Tester Andrew has been busy with niftymitter 0.24, as reported earlier. He has now put up a thorough post on his blog, discussing some of the early issues he is having. To paraphrase, he wishes particularly for a means of adjusting the line input level, as well an AM version of the transmitter, and a similarly designed radio receiver. I am very much in favour of all of these – the level adjustment seems an obvious oversight now, and I think a sister radio reciever for Niftymitter would be both elegant and an interesting development for new applications. Mike Shorter in Dundee mentioned this early on as a means of relaying a transmission across a longer distance..

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment

More Niftymitter testing from Andrew

Broadcasting Vinyl

Andrew has been putting up some more photos from his initial v0.24 testing, which is much appreciated. Here, he is using it to broadcast a music from a vinyl playing on a rather swish record player.. Any issues in this set up Andrew?

Excellent work!

Check out the full set here.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment

Testing underway


Tester Andrew has received his kit and posted some pictures here. Looking forward to more!

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment

Dive! Cribbage Board


IMG_6119
Originally uploaded by Zero-waste Design

In the last week in Dundee I managed to get round to doing something that has been plaguing me for about two years: a cribbage board from my friend Suzy. I had already drilled the holes and it took me a while to think up something to laser engrave. I eventually decided on a kind of ‘field of shapes’ thing given that the board was already punctuated by hundreds of circular holes.

It would have been much easier to engrave first, then drill but hey, sometimes things don’t happen in the right order! I have put up the .svg for the layout on Thingiverse so that others can do it in the right order. And an instructable here.

There is significance in the name of this cribbage board, but it might take you a while to realise..

The image set is here
.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in none | Leave a comment

0.24 testing: my experience

From what I’ve heard, the testers have received their kits and are underway with hacking. We made use of my 0.24 prototype over christmas, with some mixed results -

Used it at first to transmit sound from my brother’s laptop to the living room stereo. Whereas the sound from the laptop is tinny and quiet, it seems the signal from Niftymitter is too much the other way – quite bassy, which isn’t a great problem except that it seems to clip distort quite easily when things get a bit bassy in the TV soundtrack (we were watching James May’s Lego programme on the laptop).

Also tested it at a greater distance, from the first floor, transmitting a mp3 recording to the radio in the kitchen, and transmitting a digital radio programmed from the kitchen to the living room, distances of 10 – 15m I would guess. There seems to be very little interference in my house, which is a victorian brick building. So better range than I had in the college building in Dundee (modern concrete all the way). The other problem with doing things over a longer distance was with levels: The transmitter requires only a very low signal  level, so I generally turn the volume right down on the source, make sure the receiver is tuned in correctly and then gradually raise the source level to an acceptable level. However, when the two are separated by a stair case and several corridors, it soon gets annoying adjusting levels between the two. It would be great if the transmitter automatically reduced the level to just the right volume for transmitting.

So most of the time the transmitter was just sitting next to the source (radio/laptop/PC), and didn’t call for any adaptation that I could think of – basically a passive object, although handy to be able to see the on/off light. I still am a little unsure about the orientation of the unit. i generally like to have it standing up on its end, but its not particularly stable like this, with the cable pulling it over. For these uses, it would be great if the unit was heavier, or had rubber feet or similar to stop slipping. The inaccuracies in the cardboard construcation are still irritating, the slight bulge of the sleeve comoponent making the object a bit unstable on a surface again.

The biggest problem for me however, and I know for one other tester, is in retuning the transmitter. I took delivery of some trim tools from Rapid that reduce the effects of interference of touching the trim cap with a metal screwdriver blade, but curiously, there was still some intereference. So I had to play with the radio receiver to see what the offset was when using the trim tool and then account for that when retuning. Not good. The point was, once I got the transmitter down to Lancashire, radio 2 was very strong on the freq the transmitter was tuned to, so, not wanting to interfere with it, wanted to retune. At first i thought this isn’t something one would want to do often however, you would have to do it whenever you moved the transmitter a significant distance across the country! I think some kind of permanent dial, perhaps glued onto the trimcap, would be a great improvement..

Sorry there are no photos, will remedy next time. So a few of the problems are electronic there, which I can’t do much about, but some nice mechanical issues too. Will put them in as issues on the google code project, but will be intrigued to find out what other peoples’ experiences are.

Bookmark and Share
Posted in Niftymitter | Leave a comment
  • I'm developing an open source mini radio transmitter, and need hackers/makers/designers/users to help me to do it! And preferably a radio electronics whizz too.

  • Subscribe Bookmark and Share
  • Latest Photos

    Image007

    Image006

    IMG_6144

    More Photos
  • All work documented on this site is open to reproduction and derivation, including for commercial use, provided attribution is given and derivative work is licensed in the same way.

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.